User Tools

Site Tools


principles:keep_it_simple_stupid

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
principles:keep_it_simple_stupid [2025-11-18 06:36] – created veronicamcnallyprinciples:keep_it_simple_stupid [2025-11-25 10:53] (current) – old revision restored (2021-10-20 21:09) christian
Line 1: Line 1:
-Uproot U.S. Healthcare: To Reform U.S. Healthcare was written by someone who should know the best way to reform the system. Deane Waldman, MD MBA is both a practicing physician, as a pediatric cardiologist, and a speaker on healthcare reform.+====== Keep It Simple Stupid (KISS) ======
  
-Family healthcare is some of the most important exactly what it the minds of the elders in your house. When it comes to children, the numbers of problems the growing system face cause increased going out of our home to play are a variety of. Since there are numerous infections in the air, it is difficult for want you to stay shielded from all illnesses. It is the same with adults in the house, absence in office, at the market, basically at a neighbor's house, you are vulnerable in order to large number of illnesses. Family healthcare does not just mean that when a part is sick, he/she gets treatment. It rather demonstrates that when you might be hale and hearty, he/she should get regular check-ups to stay the same.+===== Variations and Alternative Names =====
  
-Get knowledge of the healthcare field. You'll become a more effective healthcare consultant if you have an experience with this spot. You can apply as a volunteer or work as marketing staff for a physician or for you to some hospital. Additional exposure you getgreater your chances of understanding search engine optimization gainesville.+  * (Rule of) Simplicity 
 +  * KISS may also mean "Keep it short and simple""keep it simple and straightforward", "keep it smart and simple", etc. A large amount of variations exists.
  
-My greatest fear may be that this healthcare plan will limit services, increase costs, and overall reduce fairly of attentionObama promises exactly opposite. I'm hoping he is perfect. My is actually that once the Acupuncture clinic government is actually charge can be certainly no dependabilityThe progressives express that over 40,000 people die each year because they not have access to healthcareOnce this bill is passedthat stat will be hidden. Generally if the bill passes, will anyone question 10 years from just how many died due to lack of care? Whether or not 80,000 would die brand new would claim success. They will say that 160,000 enjoy died minus the bill.+**Remarks**: "Stupid" may be interpreted as an adjective or a nounCompare the two variants "keep it simple and stupid" vs"keep it simplestupid!"Despite all these alternative names, the general idea of the KISS principle is always the same.
  
-Hospital resources such as beds, operating theatres and delivery suites can be established well in advance, based close to the Osteopathic clinic number of patients. Will need to help to relieve the need for an emergency bed dissatisfaction with the fourth department. 
  
-Hospitals because medical locations need to Acupuncture clinic able to view how well they are going to do. Performance monitoring can be carried out using healthcare reporting systems, so that any areas that have to have be improved can be quickly unearthed.+===== Context =====
  
-The government will mandate that insurance providers insure using "pre-existing conditions". They are accused of denying people coverage a new result of these conditions, since cannot make a fortune. The premiums will to help be huge, so will the government just reimburse them with tax dollars?+  * [[contexts:Object-Oriented Design]] 
 +  * [[contexts:Architecture]] 
 +  * [[contexts:User Interface Design]] 
 +  * [[contexts:Implementation]]
  
-Of course, you can't simply expect a job to fall into your lap without any effort. Every one of these healthcare jobs will require some training, and faster that beginning it, greater off you will be. After all, this economy will not wait to make sure you pick up that novel. Start training today!+===== Principle Statement =====
  
-PC based software possesses low price ownership. Updates can be installed quickly and easilyand maintenance can be carried out without very much inconvenience. As an alternative to requiring your own engineer to visit, an affiliate of the hospital IT staff should have the capability to resolve any problems.+A simple solution is better than complex oneeven if the solution looks stupid
  
-Don't ready to go for you to allowing Insurance providers to deny coverage with different pre-existing skin problem. And the days of canceling insurance each and every person is sick are gone. These changes that are perceived through public being good will stay in internet site. Insurance companies expect to have a large new pool of young, healthy folks buying insurance. If the does not happen, someone must spend cost. That could be you. Either you pay more for coverage pesticides government a new transfer price. Either way, we are liable. 
  
-You would be wise to look toward the news related for the industry. Require to also consider and find the actual companies which are hiring the healthcare agents. If you need it in taking a transfer from one industry to the 新潟市中央区 交通事故治療 then must first of all discover the qualities which is actually fruitful for the health companies.+===== Description =====
  
-Republicans are saying they will attempt to obtain the bill repealedThis will be their issue in the 2010 elections. I am willing and start to give it chance, but what happens if it fails to lessen costswill not insure those without insuranceor makes 新潟市中央区 交通事故治療 more dangerous?+The KISS principle is about striving for simplicityModern programming languages, frameworks and APIs have powerful means to create sophisticated solutions for various kinds of problems. Sometimes developers might feel tempted to write "clever" solutions that use all these complex features. The KISS principle states that solution is better when it uses less inheritanceless polymorphismfewer classes, etc.
  
-We are paying for treatment of situations that i are We only get treatment many of us are sick and tiredCaring for the sick precisely what our will be doing on the day to day reason. We are performing anything in order to illnesses or manage current lifestyle choices to ensure presently there will be fewer issues in foreseeable futureThat will be [[https://links.Gtanet.com.br/tomcaz585837|新潟市中央区 交通事故治療]]. Approach has become popular not the devices we are undertaking.+A solution that follows the KISS principle might look boring or even "stupid" but simple and understandable. The KISS principle states that there is no value in a solution being "clever" but being easily understandable. 
 + 
 +This does not mean that features like inheritance and polymorphism should not be used at allRather they should only be used when they are necessary or there is some substantial advantage. 
 + 
 +===== Rationale ===== 
 + 
 +A simpler solution is better than a complex one because simple solutions are easier to maintain. This includes increased readability, understandability, and changeabilityFurthermore, writing simple code is less error-prone. 
 + 
 +The advantage of simplicity is even more significant when the person who maintains the software is not the one who once wrote it. The maintainer might also be less familiar with sophisticated programming language features. So simple and stupid programs are easier to maintain because the maintainer needs less time to understand them and is less likely to introduce further defects. 
 + 
 +One reason to create more complex code is to make it more flexible to accommodate further requirements. But one cannot know how to make it flexible or if that flexibility will be ever needed. 
 + 
 +"When you make your code more flexible or sophisticated than it needs to be, you over-engineer it. Some do this because they believe they know their system's future requirements. The reason that it's best to make a design more flexible or sophisticated today is to accommodate the needs of tomorrow. That sounds reasonable, if you happen to be a psychic." - Refactoring To Patterns - Joshua Kerievsky. 
 + 
 +Another reason to create more complex code is to make optimizationsAn optimized code is a more complex code. Pareto principle applies also in code: a program spends most of the time in a small portion of the code, so it will be wise to concentrate the effort to optimize only that part of the code. Another best practice is to follow the  
 +"Three rules of optimization": (1. Don't, 2. Don't... Yet, 3. Profile before optimizing), which make sense: to optimize only the code with performance problems. (First author: Michael A. Jackson) 
 + 
 + 
 +===== Strategies ===== 
 + 
 +This is a very general principle, so there is a large variety of possible strategies to adhere more to this principle largely depending on the given design problem: 
 + 
 +  * Avoid inheritance, polymorphism, dynamic binding and other complicated OOP concepts. Use delegation and simple if-constructs instead. 
 +  * Avoid low-level optimization of algorithms, especially when involving Assembler, bit-operations, and pointers. Slower implementations will work just fine. 
 +  * Use simple brute-force solutions instead of complicated algorithms. Slower algorithms will work in the first place. 
 +  * Avoid numerous classes and methods as well as large code blocks (see [[More Is More Complex]]) 
 +  * For slightly unrelated but rather small pieces of functionality use private methods instead of an additional class. 
 +  * Avoid general solutions needing parameterization. A specific solution will suffice. 
 +  * ... 
 + 
 + 
 +===== Caveats ===== 
 + 
 +See section [[#contrary principles]]. 
 + 
 + 
 +===== Origin ===== 
 + 
 +The principle was coined by the American engineer Kelly Johnson referring to the requirement that a military aircraft should be repairable with a limited set of tools under combat conditions ((Ben R. Rich: //[[http://www.nap.edu/html/biomems/cjohnson.pdf|Clarence Leonard (Kelly) Johnson 1910—1990: A Biographical Memoir]]//)). 
 + 
 +The principle of striving for simple solutions sometimes is also called "(rule of) simplicity"((Eric S. Raymond: //[[http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/taoup/html/ch01s06.html#id2877917|The Art of Unix Programming]]//)) which was also prominently stated by Tony Hoare in his Turing Award lecture: "I conclude that there are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult."((Tony Hoare: //[[http://awards.acm.org/images/awards/140/articles/4622167.pdf|The Emperor’s Old Clothes / The 1980 ACM Turing Award Lecture]]//)) 
 + 
 + 
 +===== Evidence ===== 
 +/* Comment out what is not applicable and explain the rest: */ 
 +/*  * [[wiki:Proposed]]*/ 
 +/*  * [[wiki:Questioned]]*/ 
 + 
 + 
 +[[wiki:Accepted]]: This principle is widely known and accepted in practice. See for example Jargon File: //[[http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/K/KISS-Principle.html|KISS Principle]]// 
 + 
 +[[wiki:Examined]]: While the preference for simple solutions can be considered trivially intuitive, there has been some work relating simplicity or rather complexity and certain quality attributes. But as there is no universally applicable complexity metric and not even a commonly agreed upon clear definition of simplicity, research is bound to examine certain aspects of KISS independently.  
 + 
 +The following hypotheses can be stated: 
 +  - Simpler solutions are faster to implement. 
 +  - Simpler solutions yield fewer implementation faults (which reduces testing effort). 
 +  - Simpler solutions are easier to maintain, i.e. detecting and correcting defects is more effective and efficient. 
 +  - Simpler solutions yield more reliable software, i.e. fewer defects show up after releasing the software. 
 + 
 +All these hypotheses can be examined with respect to different complexity metrics. 
 + 
 +Hypothesis 1 is true by definition. If the solution cannot be implemented quickly, it is not simple.  
 + 
 +Though hypotheses 2 and 3 are not true by definition but they can be regarded intuitively clear. Nevertheless, there is some research. In ((Virginia R. Gibson and James A. Senn: //[[http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=62073|System Structure and Software Maintenance Performance]]//)) a system was improved in two steps resulting in three variants of the same system. Several metrics show that the improvements reduced complexity. 36 programmers with varying experience conducted three different maintenance tasks and their performance was measured. The results indicate that the improvements also improved maintainability. Several other studies support the correlation between complexity and maintainability((Chris F. Kemerer: //[[http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF02249043?LI=true|Software complexity and software maintenance: A survey of empirical research]]//)). 
 + 
 +Furthermore, software cost estimation techniques are partly based on complexity judgments((Barry W. Boehm: //Software Engineering Economics//, IEEE)). So complexity---although this normally relates the complexity of the problem and not to the complexity of the solution---is a known cost factor which may be accounted to maintenance. 
 + 
 +Lastly, hypothesis 4 is likely to be false. Several studies relating complexity metrics and post-release reliability show that module size in lines of code predicts reliability at least as good as the McCabe metric (also called cyclomatic complexity) ((see Albert Endres, Dieter Rombach: //A Handbook of Software and Systems Engineering//, p. 168ff.)). Assuming cyclomatic complexity correctly depicts the complexity of a module, reliability should not the reason for applying KISS. 
 + 
 + 
 +===== Relations to Other Principles ===== 
 + 
 +==== Generalizations ==== 
 + 
 +==== Specializations ==== 
 + 
 +  * [[More Is More Complex]] (MIMC): KISS states that one should strive for simplicity. MIMC makes this more concrete stating that more of anything (methods, classes, lines of code, ...) increases complexity. 
 +  * [[You Ain't Gonna Need It]] (YAGNI) 
 +  * [[Rule of Parsimony]] 
 +  * [[Rule of Robustness]] 
 + 
 +==== Contrary Principles ==== 
 + 
 +Note that many principles are contrary to KISS. This means that it is worthwhile to consider KISS when considering one of those. Nevertheless this does not mean that this is true the other way around. When considering KISS, one wouldn't want to consider all principles that have complexity as a disadvantage. So here are those needing consideration: 
 + 
 +  * **[[Generalization Principle]] (GP)**: This is the directly converse principle. A generally applicable solution typically is not simple anymore. 
 +  * **[[Murphy's Law]] (ML)**: The ultimate reason behind KISS is to increase maintainability and reduce the introduction of defects. But following KISS blindly by always using the simplest solution may also lead to //reduced// maintainability when Murphy's Law is not considered. 
 +  * [[Model Principle]] (MP): There are often simpler ways to build a software system than to model and mirror the real-world behavior, which frequently means having more objects and more complicated structures. Nevertheless, it is advisable to do so anyway. 
 + 
 +==== Complementary Principles ==== 
 + 
 +==== Principle Collections ==== 
 + 
 +{{page>collections:OOD Principle Language#Box}} 
 +{{page>collections:Unix Philosophy (Eric S. Raymond)#Box}} 
 + 
 + 
 +===== Examples ===== 
 + 
 +==== Example 1: Fuzzy Simplicity ==== 
 + 
 +Simplicity is a blurry, partly subjective measure. Sometimes it is difficult to tell what is simpler. The following example shows that: 
 + 
 +<code java> 
 +public String weekday1(int dayOfWeek) 
 +
 +    switch (dayOfWeek) 
 +    { 
 +        case 1: return "Monday"; 
 +        case 2: return "Tuesday"; 
 +        case 3: return "Wednesday"; 
 +        case 4: return "Thursday"; 
 +        case 5: return "Friday"; 
 +        case 6: return "Saturday"; 
 +        case 7: return "Sunday"; 
 +        default: throw new IllegalArgumentException("dayOfWeek must be in range 1..7"); 
 +    } 
 +
 + 
 +public String weekday2(int dayOfWeek) 
 +
 +    if ((dayOfWeek < 1) || (dayOfWeek > 7)) 
 +        throw new IllegalArgumentException("dayOfWeek must be in range 1..7"); 
 + 
 +    final String[weekdays = { 
 +        "Monday", "Tuesday", "Wednesday", "Thursday", "Friday", "Saturday", "Sunday"}; 
 + 
 +    return weekdays[dayOfWeek-1]
 +
 +</code> 
 + 
 +Both methods do exactly the same thingThey return a string representing the weekday. Just the implementation is different. Both versions may be seen as simpler than the other depending on the view taken. ''weekday2'' has less statements and less execution branches. Complexity metrics measuring these aspects (e.g. the [[glossary:cyclomatic complexity]]) will therefore prefer ''weekday2''
 + 
 +On the other hand ''weekdays1'' uses less language features (just switch, return, and exceptions whereas ''weekdays2'' needs if, arrays, arithmetic, return, and exceptions). Furthermore in ''weekdays1'' the relation between input and output can be seen directly and it's clear how it works by just seeing the method. But for understanding ''weekday2'' there are more details to think about. This is especially true for the range check at the beginning and the index computation in the ''return'' statement. Clearly this is not particularly difficult but these are aspects which are more difficult than in the other version of the method. 
 + 
 +So it's not objectively clear which of the two implementations KISS prefers without saying which complexity metric to apply. But this ambiguity is not a problem since principles are not meant to be unambiguous and objective. Eventually a human developer has to decide which solution to implement and the principles only give guidelines. 
 +===== Description Status ===== 
 +/* Choose one of the following and comment out the rest: */ 
 +/*[[wiki:Stub]]*/ 
 +[[wiki:Incomplete]] 
 +/*[[wiki:Complete]]*/ 
 + 
 +===== Further Reading ===== 
 + 
 +  * [[wiki>KeepItSimple]] 
 +  * [[wp>KISS principle]] 
 +  * [[http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/kiss.html|Apache: KISS]] 
 +  * [[http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/taoup/html/ch01s06.html#id2877917|The Art of Unix Programming: Rule of Simplicity]] 
 + 
 +===== Discussion ===== 
 + 
 +Discuss this wiki article and the principle on the corresponding [[talk:principles:Keep It Simple Stupid|talk page]].
principles/keep_it_simple_stupid.1763444199.txt.gz · Last modified: by veronicamcnally